Review guidelines

Journal Purpose

Jurnal Terobosan Peduli Masyarakat (TIRAKAT) aims to facilitate the dissemination of current information and knowledge in the field of multidisciplinary in community service, especially in Indonesia. TIRAKAT presents articles that explore various aspects of community service, embracing fields such as social sciences, economics, education, engineering, and more. The primary goal of this journal is to unearth and disseminate knowledge that can have a direct positive impact on society.

Reviewer Criteria

  1. Have sufficient competence and knowledge in the field of multidisciplinary in community service.
  2. Experienced as a researcher, teacher or practitioner in the field of multidisciplinary in community service.
  3. Able to conduct reviews objectively and openly without any bias or conflict of interest.

Review Procedure

  1. Each article will be assigned to a minimum of two reviewers in accordance with the field of expertise.
  2. Reviewers will examine the article carefully and provide clear and constructive feedback.
  3. Reviewers will provide recommendations regarding whether the article is suitable for publication or not.
  4. Reviewers are expected to provide feedback within 2-4 weeks after the article is received.

Assessed Aspects

  1. Originality and novelty of the article.
  2. Relevance of the article to the field of multidisciplinary in community service.
  3. The quality of the research methodology used.
  4. Clarity and completeness of data analysis and research results.
  5. Adherence of the article to the writing format and academic rules.

Reviewer Ethics

  1. Maintain the confidentiality of the article assigned for review.
  2. Not plagiarise or use information obtained from the article being reviewed for personal gain.
  3. Provide honest, open and objective feedback.
  4. Not discriminate against authors based on background or institutional origin.

Follow-up

  1. If the article is recommended for publication, the author will be asked to make revisions in accordance with the feedback from the reviewer.
  2. If the article is not recommended for publication, the author will be given clear and constructive reasons for future improvements.
  3. If the article is recommended for revision, the author will be asked to make improvements in accordance with the feedback from the reviewer and resubmit the revised article for review.
  4. If the article has been revised and stated to meet the criteria for publication, the article will be approved for publication and further processed by the editorial team.

Awards

  1. Reviewers who have reviewed well and consistently will receive an award from Jurnal Terobosan Peduli Masyarakat (TIRAKAT).
  2. The award can be in the form of a certificate of appreciation or recognition in journal publications.

Conclusion

TIRAKAT Reviewer Guidelines is expected to assist reviewers in performing their duties properly and consistently. With these guidelines, it is hoped that this journal can maintain high quality publications that are relevant to the field of multidisciplinary in community service.