Deconstructing the Connectivity of the Equator City Branding as an Instrument of Public Policy Communication with Tourism Infrastructure Development in Pontianak
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61100/tacit.v4i2.380Keywords:
City Branding, Institutional Interpretation, Public Policy Communication, Tourism Infrastructure, Inter-Agency CoordinationAbstract
City branding can function as public policy communication when a shared urban identity is translated into planning and physical development. This study examines how Pontianak’s “Equator City” identity is interpreted and translated into tourism infrastructure across local government institutions. Using a qualitative case study, data were drawn from semi-structured interviews with three institutionally positioned informants from BAPERIDA, PUPR, and Disporapar, supported by local planning documents. The findings reveal an institutional interpretation gap: although the three agencies broadly share the symbolic meaning of Equator City, they attach different operational meanings to it according to their institutional mandates. Infrastructure may therefore substantively support the city’s identity without being intentionally designed to communicate it. The study also distinguishes procedural coordination from substantive coordination, showing that routine inter-agency collaboration does not necessarily produce a shared interpretation of city identity. These findings highlight intra-governmental interpretation as an important link between city branding, public policy communication, and infrastructure development.
References
Alsayel, A., Fransen, J., & de Jong, M. (2023). City branding in a multi-level governance context: Comparing branding performance across five institutional models for urban development in Saudi Arabia. Journal of Place Management and Development, 16(2), 267–290. https://doi.org/10.1108/JPMD-07-2022-006
Collins, B. (2024). Place branding and its discontents: The politics and management of neighborhood govern-ance systems. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 44(2), 649–662. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X21998448
Do, T. D., & Do, S. X. (2025). Shaping urban identity: How physical and non-physical factors influence resi-dent perception. SAGE Open, 15(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440251403740
Eshuis, J., & Ripoll González, L. (2025). Conceptualising place branding in three approaches: Towards a new definition of place brands as embodied experiences. Journal of Place Management and Development, 18(1), 61–79. https://doi.org/10.1108/JPMD-11-2023-0109
Heriyanto, Fathonah, I. N., Harisal, Listiana, Y. D., & Damasinta, A. (2025). Implementation of border tourism development policy: Analysis of the dynamics of policy content and implementation context. Journal of Government Science Studies, 4(1), 50–60.
Heriyanto, Niswaty, R., Fathonah, I. N., Herdiansyah, D., Fahrizal, M., & Suprihartini, L. (2026). Local com-munity participation as both a catalyst and an outcome of sustainable tourism development: A case study of Rimba dan Budaya, West Kalimantan, Indonesia. International Review for Spatial Planning and Sustainable Development, 14(2), 190–211.
Ito, H., & Denscombe, N. (2025). Governance through sustainability branding: The strategic application of Japan’s SDGs Future City Initiative. Local Government Studies. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/03003930.2025.2605472
Mbinza, Z. E. (2024). Connecting place branding to social and governance constructs in Johannesburg, South Africa. Place Branding and Public Diplomacy, 20, 408–423. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41254-024-00340-x
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.
OECD. (2026). Local identity, pride and branding in place transformation: Embedding place branding in public policies and governance. OECD Publishing.
Park, B.-G., Lee, J. H., Han, D. K., Lee, S., Paek, Y., & Shim, H. (2024). Enabling infrastructure: Seeing infrastruc-ture as the urban commons. International Journal of Urban Sciences, 28(4), 722–734. https://doi.org/10.1080/12265934.2024.2321337
Patalon, M. (2026). Situated isomorphism: Institutional logics and the interpretive dynamics of municipal digital transformation. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 39(8), 39–55. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOCM-06-2025-0521
Ripoll González, L. (2025). A dynamic regional branding process as a governance tool for sustainability tran-sitions. Action Research, 23(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/14767503251342738
Ripoll González, L., Klijn, E.-H., Eshuis, J., & Braun, E. (2025). Does participation predict support for place brands? An analysis of the relationship between stakeholder involvement and brand citizenship behav-ior. Public Administration Review, 85(1), 192–206. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13776
Sager, F., & Gofen, A. (2022). The polity of implementation: Organizational and institutional arrangements in policy implementation. Governance, 35(2), 347–364. https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12677
Stevens, V., Klijn, E.-H., & Warsen, R. (2021). Branding as a public governance strategy: A Q methodological analysis of how companies react to place branding strategies. Public Administration Review, 81(4), 752–762. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13263
Thornton, P. H., Ocasio, W., & Lounsbury, M. (2012). The institutional logics perspective: A new approach to cul-ture, structure, and process. Oxford University Press.
Weick, K. E., Sutcliffe, K. M., & Obstfeld, D. (2005). Organizing and the process of sensemaking. Organization Science, 16(4), 409–421. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1050.0133
White, J. T., Kenny, T., Samuel, F., Foye, C., James, G., & Serin, B. (2024). Are well-designed places possible? A model of design governance intervention in the planning, design and development of new neighbour-hoods. Journal of Urban Design, 29(5), 495–516. https://doi.org/10.1080/13574809.2023.2296885
Xiao, M., Zhan, X., & Cudennec, A. (2025). Coping with competing institutional logics in policy implementa-tion. Governance, 38(3), e70036. https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.70036
Zavattaro, S. M., Marland, A., & Eshuis, J. (2021). Public branding and marketing: Theoretical and practical developments. Public Administration Review, 81(4), 728–730. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13372
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Technology and Society Perspectives (TACIT)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.