Reconstructing the Adaptive Performance Management Model in the Dynamics of Flexible and Hybrid Work in the Digital Era

Authors

  • Risnawati STIE Pembangunan Tanjungpinang
  • Ahmad Junaidi Institut Ilmu Sosial Dan Manajemen STIAMI
  • Sunarmin Institut Ilmu Sosial Dan Manajemen STIAMI

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61100/adman.v3i1.263

Keywords:

Adaptive Performance Management, Flexible Work, Hybrid Work, Digital Era, Agile Performance Management

Abstract

This study aims to reconstruct the adaptive performance management model within the context of flexible and hybrid work dynamics in the digital era. The research approach used is a literature review with a qualitative method and descriptive analysis. Data was collected from Google Scholar and several credible websites for the period 1991–2025, initially comprising 30 articles, which were then filtered down to 17 most relevant articles through a stringent selection process. The research findings show that traditional performance management models need to transform into more adaptive systems by integrating agile principles, the use of digital technology, self-determination theory, goal-setting theory, and dynamic capability theory. In hybrid and flexible work environments, performance is more effectively assessed using an outcome-based approach, continuous feedback, and real-time digital platforms. This research also highlights the importance of new competencies for managers to manage remote team performance and the need to prioritize employee psychological well-being within the adaptive performance management system. Case studies from various multinational companies support these findings, where flexible performance management approaches have enhanced productivity and employee engagement. This research is expected to serve as a foundation for organizations to develop performance management systems that are more relevant to the demands of modern work.

References

N. P. Onyekwelu, E. F. Monyei, and U. S. Muogbo, “Flexible Work Arrangements and Workplace Productivity: Examining The Nexus,” International Journal of Financial, Accounting, and Management, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 303–314, Dec. 2022, doi: 10.35912/ijfam.v4i3.1059.

I. G. P. Suardana and Asruni, “Work Capacity and Capability Through Adaptive Performance,” BDJ Smart : Breakthrough Development Journal in Strategic Management & Marketing, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 1–9, 2025.

R. Rahmatullah, A. Hari Edy Wibowo, and M. Mustaqim, “Team Dynamics in a Hybrid Work Environment: Effective Strategies for Enhancing Employee Performance and Well-being,” Jurnal Informatika Ekonomi Bisnis, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 100–105, Mar. 2024, doi: 10.37034/infeb.v6i1.810.

B. Y. Kassa and E. K. Worku, “The impact of artificial intelligence on organizational performance: The mediating role of employee productivity,” Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, vol. 11, no. 1, p. 100474, Mar. 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.joitmc.2025.100474.

L. Urrila, A. Siiriäinen, L. Mäkelä, and H. Kangas, “Sense of belonging in hybrid work settings,” J Vocat Behav, vol. 157, p. 104096, Mar. 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.jvb.2025.104096.

T. C. Bednall and M. D. Henricks, “Adaptive Performance,” in Global Perspectives on Change Management and Leadership in the Post-COVID-19 Era, IGI GLOBAL, 2021, pp. 71–89. doi: 10.4018/978-1-7998-6948-1.ch005.

S. Shagvaliyeva and R. Yazdanifard, “Impact of Flexible Working Hours on Work-Life Balance,” American Journal of Industrial and Business Management, vol. 04, no. 01, pp. 20–23, 2014, doi: 10.4236/ajibm.2014.41004.

H. Harini, D. P. Wahyuningtyas, S. Sutrisno, M. I. Wanof, and A. M. A. Ausat, “Marketing Strategy for Early Childhood Education (ECE) Schools in the Digital Age,” Jurnal Obsesi : Jurnal Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 2742–2758, 2023, doi: 10.31004/obsesi.v7i3.4454.

A. M. A. Ausat, H. K. Azzaakiyyah, R. M. Permana, Y. Riady, and S. Suherlan, “The Role of ChatGPT in Enabling MSMEs to Compete in the Digital Age,” Innovative: Journal Of Social Science Research, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 622–631, 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.31004/innovative.v3i2.346.

Emmanuel Chibuike Daraojimba, Chinedu Nnamdi Nwasike, Abimbola Oluwatoyin Adegbite, Chinedu Alex Ezeigweneme, and Joachim Osheyor Gidiagba, “Comprehensive Review of Agile Methodologies in Project Management,” Computer Science & IT Research Journal, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 190–218, Jan. 2024, doi: 10.51594/csitrj.v5i1.717.

D. J. Teece, G. Pisano, and A. Shuen, “Dynamic capabilities and strategic management,” Strategic Management Journal, vol. 18, no. 7, pp. 509–533, Aug. 1997, doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199708)18:7<509::AID-SMJ882>3.0.CO;2-Z.

E. D. Pulakos, R. M. Hanson, S. Arad, and N. Moye, “Performance Management Can Be Fixed: An On-the-Job Experiential Learning Approach for Complex Behavior Change,” Ind Organ Psychol, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 51–76, Mar. 2015, doi: 10.1017/iop.2014.2.

R. M. Ryan and E. L. Deci, “Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being.,” American Psychologist, vol. 55, no. 1, pp. 68–78, 2000, doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68.

Microsoft, “The Next Great Disruption Is Hybrid Work—Are We Ready?,” www.microsoft.com.

M. Gibbs, F. Mengel, and C. Siemroth, “Work from Home &amp; Productivity: Evidence from Personnel &amp; Analytics Data on IT Professionals,” SSRN Electronic Journal, pp. 1–40, 2021, doi: 10.2139/ssrn.3841567.

H. L. Tosi, E. A. Locke, and G. P. Latham, “A Theory of Goal Setting and Task Performance,” The Academy of Management Review, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 212–247, Apr. 1991, doi: 10.2307/258875.

Aakash Dharmadhikari, “GO-JEK OKR FAQ,” medium.com.

Downloads

Published

2025-05-03

How to Cite

Risnawati, Junaidi, A., & Sunarmin. (2025). Reconstructing the Adaptive Performance Management Model in the Dynamics of Flexible and Hybrid Work in the Digital Era. Journal of Contemporary Administration and Management (ADMAN), 3(1), 638–644. https://doi.org/10.61100/adman.v3i1.263

Issue

Section

Articles